I don’t just think that. There is a lot of data backing that up, and yes, for every company forcing back to office, there is another capitalizing on their loss of talent.
This is the government, this is about efficiency, and what can be demonstrated with evidence, not how you feel about something.
You are VERY HAPPY they are moving back to a more wasteful model?
So you want to pay for a less efficient system? Like, intentionally?
Also, most WFH employees aren’t working for the government. The government lags behind the private sector, even in the most highly WFH industries, like IT, and law.
WFM models are more efficient, so forcing people back to the office is less efficient. He has no proof people aren’t doing their jobs, and the proof there is is against him. He is doing spiteful boomer shit, or is stupid, or is trying to legally dump as many workers as he can to replace them with those who will express fealty to him, maybe all three.
So he wants to get rid of people working in the office during times their job doesn’t require it?
Or, hear me out, we dump the inefficient operating model, and move on, instead of bending knee to oligarchs.
Federal worker discusses issues of antiquated, fiscally inefficient, operating model, forced back into play due purely to spite, maybe sheer stupidity
You keep coming at this from the angle I am mad people lose their jobs. I am not, they will very likely find work without a huge issue. The problem is the government, that I pay taxes to, is using uselessly less efficient methods of operation, out of a combination of spite, and the desire to meet the project 2025 quota of turning people over to those who will kiss the ring.
You are like a con-man who thinks everyone else is also a fraud because you can’t imagine people thinking drastically different than you, about the same things. That and the crabs in a pot mentality of “you can’t have it better than I did! if things get better, that’s not fair to me! now get back down here and suffer with me.”